Best Nike Running Shorts in 2022
NIKE Men's Challenger 5in Running Shorts, Black/Reflective Silver, Medium
- Nike Dry fabric helps you stay dry, comfortable and focused.
- Mesh panels for enhanced breathability.
- Side pockets offer convenient storage.
- 5" inseam provides coverage without limiting range of motio
- Internal drop-in pocket offers convenient small-item storage.
Nike Women's Dri-fit Tempo Track 3.5 Short (Black/White/Wolf Grey, Medium)
- Nike Dry fabric helps you stay dry and comfortable.
- 3" inseam features a curved hem for great range of motion.
- Side mesh panels ventilate to keep you cool.
- Internal audio pocket on the back-right provides convenient storage for small items.
- Elastic waistband with an internal drawcord for a personalized fit. Drawcord has Nike Running and Swoosh design trademark print.
Nike Men's Challenger Dri-FIT 7" Running Shorts (M, Snded Purple)
- Style#: AJ7687-493
- Multiple pockets offer convenient storage.
- Elastic waistband has a comfortable feel and modern look.
- Internal drawcord to provide a personalized fit.
- 7" inseam delivers coverage while allowing you to move freely.
Nike 3" Race Shorts-Black-Small
- Nike Dry fabric helps you stay dry and comfortable
- 3'' inseam features a curved hem for great range of motion
- mesh side inset ventilate to keep you cool
- waistband with internal drawciod for a personalized fit.
Nike Women's Crew Running Short (White/Reflective Silver, Large)
- Nike Dry fabric helps you stay dry and comfortable.
- 3" inseam provides ideal coverage and movement.
- Side panels are perforated to enhance airflow.
- Wide elastic waistband has an internal drawcord to provide a personalized fit.
- Slide pocket on the inside-front of the waistband will hold a mobile phone. Pocket is designed with stretch fabric to help hold the phone close to your body to increase stabilization during movement.
Clothe Co. Ladies Moisture Wicking Sport Running Shorts, Pink Raspberry/White/Black, M
- Clothe Co. (TM) - Clothe Co. Ladies Moisture Wicking Sport Running Shorts
- 2.8-ounce, 100% moisture-wicking polyester crepe jersey built-in brief. Elastic waistband with drawcord. 3.25-inch inseam
- For training or relaxing, our feminine short keeps pace with high-performance moisture control. Tricot side panels provide breathability and add athletic style.
- 2.4-ounce, 100% polyester shell. 3.8-ounce, 100% moisture-wicking polyester tricot side panels
- Printed with Clothe Co. (TM) Logo Inside
BALEAF Men's 7" Quick Dry Workout Running Shorts Mesh Liner Zip Pockets Black Size M
- Lightweight and quick-dry fabric wicks sweat away and dry really fast
- Built-in mesh briefs provide a supportive, breathable fit when exercising
- Deep side pockets and zip pocket on the central back for convenience
- Side mesh panels with litter holes ensure you get extra ventilation
- Reflective elements offer more visibility for low-light situation
BALEAF Men's 5 Inches Running Athletic Shorts Zipper Pocket Gray Size M
- Lightweight, Quick-Dry woven fabric helps keep you dry and comfy
- Built-in mesh briefs provide a supportive, breathable fit
- Two side pockets and rear Zip pocket for convenience
- Inner drawcord ensures a comfortable fit and keeps shorts from sliding down
- Its 5" inseam hits at the mid-thigh for ideal coverage, helping you move freely on any type of run.
Under Armour Women's Fly By Running Shorts , Grey (045)/Reflective , X-Small
- Lightweight woven fabric delivers superior comfort & durability
- Front hand pockets with hidden back storage pocket
- Material wicks sweat & dries really fast
- Super-breathable mesh side panels to dump excess heat
- Wide Covered elastic waistband for the perfect comfort fit
Nike Women's 10K Running Shorts, Gunsmoke/Atmosphere Grey/Wolf Grey, X-Large
- STAY COOL: Stay cool as you blast through your route in the women's Nike running shorts. The breathable design offers a comfortable fit without distractions.
- THOUGHTFUL DESIGN: Drop-in pocket embedded in the waistband provides convenient storage. The curved hem and 3.5" inseam of the running shorts allow for a natural range of motion.
- SWEAT WICKING TECHNOLOGY: The Nike women's running shorts are made of sweat wicking material that keep you dry and comfortable, preventing irritation during physical activity.
- COMFORTABLE FIT: These running shorts for women have an elastic waistband for a secure fit with any type of movement. Interior drawcord allows for personalized sizing.
- NIKE WOMEN'S RUNNING SHORTS: Machine wash, imported, body fabric: 100% polyester, lining fabric: 100% recycled polyester.
iPod Theory and the Economics of Consumer Choice
From music players to cars, how price points and features make you spend more.
I won't get all technical with mumbo-jumbo stats and economics graphs. Lets look at this in gradual steps. If the smallest iPod can hold 2GB at $29.50/GB or 4GB at $19.75/GB, that's twice the storage for only 30% more. Lets take a look at the next level up that also includes a screen and video camera. You now step up to 8GB at $18.63/GB or 16GB at $11.19/GB on top of added features. The latter of the two being twice the capacity for only 20% more, or 8 times the capacity of the smallest at three times the price. Not convinced? Go a step further and you're staring at a staggeringly low $1.56/GB. That's roughly twenty times as much storage for each dollar as compared to the lowest version.
What do these ratios and percentages mean to an average buyer? Well they'll probably start at a lower model and after small incremental steps up walk out the door with a model with a capacity exponentially greater and a price not what originally drew them into the store in the first place with the excuse that it's a better buy dollar per dollar than the original.
What's that you say? I said this wasn't about mp3 players? You're absolutely right, it's about product pricing. Where perception of massively increased value with only slightly higher investment is seen there will be massive sales. I'm crazy right? Why wouldn't I want to buy a more "economical" model? Well the simple fact is, price points are not chosen at random, they're picked to make consumers buy up. Their listed prices are not reflective of their actual cost to manufacture. Case and point, again, iPods. A recent analysis of the latest iPod shuffle determines it's actual cost to manufacture including packaging is $21.77. Which is about 28% of the retail price. While the Nano is 40% and Touch 49%.
Thus we can clearly see lower models could be easily marketed for lower prices. Though as it stands you'd think they'd make more selling them and not want to push people up to their larger brethren. Not exactly, while their cost to manufacture is a higher percentage of sale price relative to the lower models, that small percentage of profit made from the highest capacity iPod Touch is more than three times the sale price of the smallest shuffle model. Thus to see the same profit from the sale of one high end model it would take roughly five sales of the lowest model. There you go, case closed.
Not everything is as cut and dry, gradually stepped as iPod pricing. Lets look at this backwards. How about cars? Many entry models start at around $20K, then fully optioned with leather, tech gizmos, big wheels and more powerful engine you're at over $40K. I can see parents using this reasoning to buy their teen a base model vs fully loaded. I mean, really, you can literally buy two base models for that price! Most mainstream cars hover around 50% net profit. This doesn't account for the billions it costs to develop them however. So manufacturers again want to maximize their profits.
As I realized this it made me look at the products I owned. While my car isn't brand new, it was at one time the top of the line. The same can be said for my iPod, Camera, Computer, Printer, well pretty much everything I own. I guess if I fell for it, and I know all about cost vs price, what chance does the average consumer have this Holiday shopping season? Hopefully by reading this you'll have the power of choice. I'm not saying to buy low or high, just buy what you need. If you only need a product to do a certain thing, don't buy a higher model that can do twice as much for only 10% more when you'll never do twice as much. It's just the principal of the thing, isn't it?