10 Best Running Shoes For Accessory Navicular Syndrome

Best Running Shoes For Accessory Navicular Syndrome in 2023

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

Bigfoot Bones: Sasquatch Skeleton Analyzed and Compared to Human

Sasquatch Skeleton structure reveals much of the nature, capabilites and habits of the living species most closely related to modern humans.

As this article is being written, there are some significant scientific efforts that are expected to be published in the near future, particularly in the field of DNA sequencing, that will provide exceptional evidence to help verify the existence of Sasquatch, or Bigfoot as a living species of hominid. Preliminary reports suggest that they may be more closely related to humans than any of the other "great apes" or higher primates, such as chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas or orangutans, perhaps even related to or within the direct lineage that resulted in modern humans.

The purpose of this essay is to lay a groundwork for analysis of the structural anatomy, based on current evidence both from still and video imagery as well as what may be the actual physical, skeletal remains that have been exhumed in a few rare instances. (The important images accompanying this article can be enlarged by selecting them by the numbers and then clicking directly on the image.) In the course of both my independent and collaborative research of the Sasquatch, or Bigfoot, I have had the very good fortune to have access to collected evidence that is not available to the general public, and that in some cases, is either copyright protected or, by request, kept confidential pending further verification. I have been able to perform analysis and biometric measurements of cast prints of hands and feet as well as photometric measurements of skeletal remains of images from still and video footage. In addition, in my travels, I have been able to view physical hominin skeletal remains of indeterminate origin that are in excess of 8 feet tall.

As a visual presentation to aggregate the findings of this research, I have constructed 3d models based on the measurements of skeletal proportions, individual bone lengths, and the angles and incidences of bone joints and linkage. (Note that the images are copyright protected and may not be reproduced online or in print without express permission.) The comparisons in the four images above are of a 5'7" human to an 8" Sasquatch

From a strictly scientific viewpoint, these 3D reconstructions are hypothetical until an actual type specimen is ether verified from existing remains or from a newly discovered specimen. However, I do believe they are generally accurate, and future research will likely either confirm, supplant, or refine in the structural details. Since this article is intended for the general public, the following observations are a general summation of my research.

A Sasquatch or Bigfoot apparently has a similar bone structure to humans. The main differences are in the proportions. The Sasquatch is much larger and more robust than the average human. The skeletal frame is also both wider and deeper than the human, by proportion. Individual bones have proportionately wider ends at the joints, and a larger diameter per length. The bone wall thickness is also likely greater in proportion to that of humans. Some other notable differences, reported by innumerable eyewitnesses, are the apparent length of the arms, the high set of the shoulders, short neck and the coned cranium or skull.

In regards to the arm length, the total measure includes the hand and fingers. In the Sasquatch, the arms, hand and fingers reach below mid-thigh in an erect stance. While in motion, a Sasquatch or Bigfoot has a bent-legged, forward-leaning stance (discussed further below) wherein the arms may appear to reach the knees. An average human's arms reach to a point nearly at mid-thigh. The hand and wrist-bones of a Sasquatch, according to my analysis, are larger and longer in proportion to a human's. The longer hand and wrist plus, slightly longer (proportionately) bones of the upper and lower arm account for the difference.

Regarding the high shoulder girdle: A Sasquatch has wide and muscular shoulders that are supported by a robust group of muscles and tendons. The neck vertebra of a Sasquatch are proportionately wider and shorter than a human. Another apparent and interesting feature of the Sasquatch skull is an area at the base, in the back, where there are pronounced flattened semi-circular planes, bordered by re-enforced ridges, where the proportionately enlarged trapesius and related muscles are connected.(The "squama occipitalus" is the anatomical term. The trapesius group is also attached below at the shoulder blades or scapula, and along the spine). This overall structure, found to a lesser extent in extreme body-builder humans, accounts for part of the incredible upper-body strength of the Sasquatch.

The coned cranium is indicative of at least a few functional capabilities. Although the muscles of the jaw do not connect near the very top of the cranium (according to my own field observations) the positioning of the jaw muscle-to-skull connections is likely both higher and wider on the skull proportionately to humans. The coning of the cranium makes a very strong support structure for both the trapesius connections and the robust jaw muscles. According to the best evidence I have, it appears the Sasquatch does not have a pronounced "saggital crest" as gorillas do. In fact, many sightings report significantly less-coned craniums in specific individuals. An explanation of the individual structural differences over large geographic areas may be due to the currently debated premise that Sasquatch may have the capability to cross-breed with humans. (This idea may have some some merit. For more discussion on this issue refer to the links in the Resources section below.) The jawbones of a Sasquatch are wider, thicker and deeper than those of a human, again in both proportion and size. The chin is thus closer in relation to the chest, and little of the neck can be seen from a frontal view. The eye sockets are also proportionately larger and rounder, perhaps due to an adaptation to low-light or nocturnal activity cycles.

The proportional length of the Sasquatch legs, compared to humans, appears to be only slightly shorter to equal in relation to the height. The individual bones have the wider joint-ends and larger diameters, a well as more robust supports for tendon-to-muscle connections. Sasquatch are prodigious travelers, capable of walking great distances and running at high speeds in sprints. However, the feet are evidently proportionately longer, thicker and wider than those of humans. Another interesting and notable feature of the Sasquatch feet is an increased range of flexibility in the "arch" of the foot. Humans characteristically have a somewhat rigid foot, with inflexible bone joints tightly bound by ligaments and connective tissue. I concur with the research of Drs. Grover Krantz and D. Jeffrey Melrdum, who posit a "Mid-Tarsal Break" or flexible bone joints in the middle section of the foot. I have also observed this feature in cast prints from my geographical areas of research in Texas and surrounding states. (see related articles listed in the Resource section below)

At this point I would like to present some observations on Sasquatch body kinetics, related to the ability to move about in natural environments. Despite their significant bulk and height, healthy Sasquatch are remarkably agile. The wide hip structure and in-ward angling bones of the upper legs provide a stable yet maneuverable support for the torso. And what appears to some to be a slouching posture is actually a forward-leaning tilt of the spine that lends constant forward momentum while walking. This is an energy-conserving aspect of their striding walk. (The spine of a Sasquatch is also straighter in profile, compared to a human's which has more of an "S" shaped curvature, viewed from the side.)

When walking, the Sasquatch also swings its arms significantly more than an average human. This provides a counter-balance to the long strides of the legs, and, with a forward thrust of the fore-arms and hands, additional forward momentum.

On the forward stride of the leg, the Sasquatch knee remains bent, unlike most humans, who tend to straighten the leg at maximum forward extension. The bent-knee stride is perhaps an adaptation to traveling in rough, uneven and often wet terrain. Having the knee slightly bent on impact enables a more fluid stride, allowing quick adjustments to obstacles such as rocks, holes and muddy depressions. The bent knee also provides a shock-absorbing capacity and helps minimize trips and falls.

Another well noted aspect of the Sasquatch stride is the "in-line" pattern seen in footprint tracks. This is evidence of another energy-efficient adaptation. The feet of a Sasquatch are typically held paralell, pointing straight forward, each one placed directly in front of the next. The inward angling of the upper leg bones from the hip enable the legs to swing forward for easy placement in this pattern. The feet and lower legs, as a result, travel in a narrow channel, each following the progress of the previous one. This also minimizes trips and falls due to snags on roots, stems and other obstacles, and is more efficient when traversing deep snow or fording rivers.

Resources:

Bigfoot Evidenced in Fossil Record

DNA Report on Sasquatch or Bigfoot

Bigfoot Foot Anatomy; fine details

Bigfoot or Sasquatch Hand Anatomy:

Bigfoot Bedding, Footprints and other evidence

Cast footprint and Sasquatch Foot anatomy