10 Worlds Best Running Shoe

Updated on: February 2021

Worlds Best Running Shoe in 2021


Adidas Vs. Puma: The Brother's Feud

Adidas Vs. Puma: The Brother's Feud
BESTSELLER NO. 1 in 2021

Runner's World Run Less, Run Faster: Become a Faster, Stronger Runner with the Revolutionary 3-Run-a-Week Training Program

Runner's World Run Less, Run Faster: Become a Faster, Stronger Runner with the Revolutionary 3-Run-a-Week Training Program
BESTSELLER NO. 2 in 2021

CURREX RUNPRO - – World’s leading insoles for Running shoes. Cushioning, dynamic support & performance

CURREX RUNPRO - – World’s leading insoles for Running shoes. Cushioning, dynamic support & performance
BESTSELLER NO. 3 in 2021
  • Rated #1 in Comfort & Foot Pressure Relief* (Scientific Study, German Sports University of Cologne, Germany)
  • Designed to help reducing injuries & pain from plantar fasciitis & other common foot problems
  • Appropriate for all shoes with removable liner / if added to other shoes you may need to go half size up for your shoe
  • Each insole boasts a different shape, arch height & flex, allowing for a customized fit
  • Blue-HIGH, Orange-MED or Red-LOW? Your foot-type determines the color!

New Balance Women's 608 V5 Casual Comfort Cross Trainer, White/Pink, 7 W US

New Balance Women's 608 V5 Casual Comfort Cross Trainer, White/Pink, 7 W US
BESTSELLER NO. 4 in 2021
  • Dual Density Collar Foam
  • Injection Molded EVA
  • Internal Shank
  • PU insert

Runner's World

Runner's World
BESTSELLER NO. 5 in 2021

Shoe Dog: A Memoir by the Creator of Nike

Shoe Dog: A Memoir by the Creator of Nike
BESTSELLER NO. 6 in 2021

My Running Shoes

My Running Shoes
BESTSELLER NO. 7 in 2021

Runner's World

Runner's World
BESTSELLER NO. 8 in 2021
  • Updated and enhanced interface for improved readability.
  • Informative daily feeds
  • More options for sharing
  • Save issues to read offline
  • Both vertical and horizontal viewing ability

Runner's World Running on Air: The Revolutionary Way to Run Better by Breathing Smarter

Runner's World Running on Air: The Revolutionary Way to Run Better by Breathing Smarter
BESTSELLER NO. 9 in 2021
  • Array

Red Shoe Diaries - Girl on a Bike

Red Shoe Diaries - Girl on a Bike
BESTSELLER NO. 10 in 2021

iPod Theory and the Economics of Consumer Choice

From music players to cars, how price points and features make you spend more.

I won't get all technical with mumbo-jumbo stats and economics graphs. Lets look at this in gradual steps. If the smallest iPod can hold 2GB at $29.50/GB or 4GB at $19.75/GB, that's twice the storage for only 30% more. Lets take a look at the next level up that also includes a screen and video camera. You now step up to 8GB at $18.63/GB or 16GB at $11.19/GB on top of added features. The latter of the two being twice the capacity for only 20% more, or 8 times the capacity of the smallest at three times the price. Not convinced? Go a step further and you're staring at a staggeringly low $1.56/GB. That's roughly twenty times as much storage for each dollar as compared to the lowest version.

What do these ratios and percentages mean to an average buyer? Well they'll probably start at a lower model and after small incremental steps up walk out the door with a model with a capacity exponentially greater and a price not what originally drew them into the store in the first place with the excuse that it's a better buy dollar per dollar than the original.

What's that you say? I said this wasn't about mp3 players? You're absolutely right, it's about product pricing. Where perception of massively increased value with only slightly higher investment is seen there will be massive sales. I'm crazy right? Why wouldn't I want to buy a more "economical" model? Well the simple fact is, price points are not chosen at random, they're picked to make consumers buy up. Their listed prices are not reflective of their actual cost to manufacture. Case and point, again, iPods. A recent analysis of the latest iPod shuffle determines it's actual cost to manufacture including packaging is $21.77. Which is about 28% of the retail price. While the Nano is 40% and Touch 49%.

Thus we can clearly see lower models could be easily marketed for lower prices. Though as it stands you'd think they'd make more selling them and not want to push people up to their larger brethren. Not exactly, while their cost to manufacture is a higher percentage of sale price relative to the lower models, that small percentage of profit made from the highest capacity iPod Touch is more than three times the sale price of the smallest shuffle model. Thus to see the same profit from the sale of one high end model it would take roughly five sales of the lowest model. There you go, case closed.

Not everything is as cut and dry, gradually stepped as iPod pricing. Lets look at this backwards. How about cars? Many entry models start at around $20K, then fully optioned with leather, tech gizmos, big wheels and more powerful engine you're at over $40K. I can see parents using this reasoning to buy their teen a base model vs fully loaded. I mean, really, you can literally buy two base models for that price! Most mainstream cars hover around 50% net profit. This doesn't account for the billions it costs to develop them however. So manufacturers again want to maximize their profits.

As I realized this it made me look at the products I owned. While my car isn't brand new, it was at one time the top of the line. The same can be said for my iPod, Camera, Computer, Printer, well pretty much everything I own. I guess if I fell for it, and I know all about cost vs price, what chance does the average consumer have this Holiday shopping season? Hopefully by reading this you'll have the power of choice. I'm not saying to buy low or high, just buy what you need. If you only need a product to do a certain thing, don't buy a higher model that can do twice as much for only 10% more when you'll never do twice as much. It's just the principal of the thing, isn't it?

Related Bestselling Lists That You Might Like